The RI70 KV95 without hall sensor draws less current at its rating (7.1 A against 7.28 A), and is lighter (270.4 g against 348 g) and shallower (24 mm against 31.8 mm). The RI75-PH KV70 has more continuous torque (1.2 N·m against 0.94 N·m) and more peak torque (3.8 N·m against 2.68 N·m), is narrower (70 mm against 76 mm), and turns faster at the output (2365 RPM against 1270/1990/2710 RPM).
The RI70 KV95 without hall sensor is US$139 and the RI75-PH KV70 is US$156. That is US$147.87 per rated N·m for the RI70 KV95 without hall sensor and US$130.00 per rated N·m for the RI75-PH KV70.
| RI70 KV95 without hall sensor | RI75-PH KV70 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rated Torque (N·m) | 0.94 | 1.2 |
| OD (mm) | 76 | 70 |
| Weight (g) | 270.4 | 348 |
| Peak Torque (N·m) | 2.68 | 3.8 |
| Rated Voltage (V) | 24/36/48 | 48 |
| Rated Speed (RPM) | 1270/1990/2710 | 2365 |
| No-Load Speed (RPM) | 1956/2934/3912 | 3360 |
| Rated Current (A) | 7.1 | 7.28 |
| Motor Constant Km (N·m/√W) | 0.2011 | — |
| Peak Current (A) | 21 | 24.2 (Ref) |
| Maximum Torque Weight Ratio (N·m/kg) | 9.91 | — |
| Height (mm) | 24 | 31.8 |
| Kv (RPM/V) | 95 | — |
| Kt (N·m/A) | 0.130 | — |
| Ke (V/kRPM) | 11.69 | — |
| Phase to Phase Resistance (mΩ) | 418 | 495 |
| Phase to Phase Inductance (μH) | 622.7 | 673 |
| Inertia (g·cm²) | 92.15 | 416 |
| Mechanical Time Constant (ms) | 0.23 | — |
| Electrical Time Constant (ms) | 1.49 | 0.0013 |
| Pole Pairs | 14 | 14 |
| Winding Type | Delta Phase 3 | — |
| Operation Ambient Temperature | -20℃~50℃ | — |
| Driving Way | FOC | — |
| Application | Cobot Arm, Exoskeleton | — |
Rows the two disagree on are marked; the figures are CubeMars'. To put any other two parts side by side, build your own comparison.