AKE90-8 KV35 vs AK80-64 KV80

The AKE90-8 KV35 has more continuous torque (55 N·m against 48 N·m), more peak torque (170 N·m against 120 N·m) and a higher torque constant (0.272 N·m/A against 0.136 N·m/A), is shallower (43.5 mm against 61.9 mm), and turns faster at the output (120 RPM against 23/48 RPM). The AK80-64 KV80 draws less current at its rating (7 A against 21 A), and is lighter (850 g against 1400 g) and narrower (98 mm against 107.5 mm).

The AKE90-8 KV35 is US$542 and the AK80-64 KV80 is US$1109. That is US$9.85 per rated N·m for the AKE90-8 KV35 and US$23.10 per rated N·m for the AK80-64 KV80.

Which to buy

Every published specification

AKE90-8 KV35AK80-64 KV80
Reduction Ratio8:164:1
Rated Power (W)700—
Rated Torque (N·m)5548
OD (mm)107.598
Weight (g)1400850
Peak Torque (N·m)170120
Rated Voltage (V)4824/48
Rated Speed (RPM)12023/48
No-Load Speed (RPM)210—
Rated Current (A)217
Peak Current (A)7219
Maximum Torque Weight Ratio (N·m/kg)121.4141.2
Height (mm)43.561.9
Kv (RPM/V)3580
Kt (N·m/A)0.2720.136
Ke (V/kRPM)0.028513.7
Phase to Phase Resistance (mΩ)164220
Phase to Phase Inductance (μH)235133.5
Mechanical Time Constant (ms)2.180.67
Electrical Time Constant (ms)1.43290.61
Pole Pairs21 Inertia (g·cm²) 3377.0821
Winding TypeDeltaDelta Backlash (°) 0.18
Operation Ambient Temperature(℃) -20℃~50℃-20℃~50℃
Driving WayFOCFOC
ApplicationExoskeletonLegged Robot, Exoskeleton, AGV
Motor Constant Km (N·m/√W)—0.29
Back Drive (N·m)—4.7
Inertia (g·cm²)—564.5
Number of Encoder—1
Inner Loop Encoder Type—Magnetic Encoder
Inner Ring Encoder Resolution—14bit
CAN Connector—A1257WR-S-4P
UART Connector—A1257WR-S-4P
Power Connector—XT30PW-M
Temperature Sensor—NTC MF51B 103F3950

Rows the two disagree on are marked; the figures are CubeMars'. To put any other two parts side by side, build your own comparison.