AK80-8 KV60 without driver vs AK10-9 V2.0 KV60

The AK80-8 KV60 without driver has a higher torque constant (0.199 N·m/A against 0.198 N·m/A), draws less current at its rating (6.9 A against 10.6 A), is lighter (570 g against 960 g) and shallower (43.9 mm against 61.7 mm), and turns faster at the output (243 RPM against 109/228 RPM). The AK10-9 V2.0 KV60 has more continuous torque (18 N·m against 10 N·m) and more peak torque (48 N·m against 25 N·m). They match on diameter.

The AK80-8 KV60 without driver is US$526 and the AK10-9 V2.0 KV60 is US$895. That is US$52.60 per rated N·m for the AK80-8 KV60 without driver and US$49.72 per rated N·m for the AK10-9 V2.0 KV60.

Which to buy

Every published specification

AK80-8 KV60 without driverAK10-9 V2.0 KV60
Reduction Ratio8:19:1
Rated Torque (N·m)1018
OD (mm)9898
Weight (g)570960
Peak Torque (N·m)2548
Motor Constant Km (N·m/√W)0.300.45
Rated Voltage (V)4824/48
Rated Speed (RPM)243109/228
Rated Current (A)6.910.6
Peak Current (A)2129.8
Maximum Torque Weight Ratio (N·m/kg)3550
Height (mm)43.961.7
Back Drive (N·m)0.750.8
Kv (RPM/V)6060
Kt (N·m/A)0.1990.198
Ke (V/kRPM)19.817.2
Phase to Phase Resistance (mΩ)430195
Phase to Phase Inductance (μH)214181
Inertia (g·cm²)608.61002
Mechanical Time Constant (ms)0.660.50
Electrical Time Constant (ms)0.50.93
Pole Pairs2121
Winding TypeStar Backlash (°) 0.38Star Backlash (°) 0.33
Number of Encoder22
Inner Loop Encoder TypeMagnetic EncoderMagnetic Encoder
Inner Ring Encoder Resolution14bit14bit
Outer Ring Encoder TypeMagnetic EncoderMagnetic Encoder
Outer Ring Encoder Resolution15bit15bit
CAN ConnectorA1257WR-S-4PA1257WR-S-4P
UART ConnectorA1257WR-S-4PA1257WR-S-4P
Power ConnectorXT30PW-MXT30PW-M
Temperature SensorNTC MF51B 103F3950NTC MF51B 103F3950
Operation Ambient Temperature-20℃~50℃-20℃~50℃
Driving WayFOCFOC
ApplicationLegged Robot, Exoskeleton, AGVLegged Robot, Exoskeleton, AGV

Rows the two disagree on are marked; the figures are CubeMars'. To put any other two parts side by side, build your own comparison.